| / / / / / / |
| Welcome Welcome / Help Welcome / Analysis Welcome / Analysis / Create a Report Welcome / Analysis / Software Profile and Costs | Get Started > < Back Next > < Back OK < Back |
Based on Intel IT’s methodology for determining the appropriate server sizing for our scale-up enterprise resource planning (ERP) environment, this tool allows you to enter data about your existing data center environment and evaluate the optimal servers for your project life cycle.
Based on Intel IT’s methodology for determining the appropriate server sizing for our scale-up enterprise resource planning (ERP) environment, this tool allows you to enter data about your existing data center environment and evaluate the optimal servers for your project life cycle.
User Aids:


Learn More About Data Center Modernization
Estimator last updated -.
Exchange rates last updated on -.
This tool models the combined effects of compute, memory and I/O to understand the overall implications for server sizing and selection to meet IT service level agreements.
It incorporates the required number of servers to address projected workloads, use of SSD vs HDD, migration to faster Ethernet adapters, and the possible freeing of labor resources to address other critical IT business needs.
Reduced software licensing costs can be one of the key reasons for high ROI when consolidating servers. It is important to update the per-server application and operating system licensing cost to reflect your actual situation.
Tool capabilities include:
User Aids:


Learn More About Data Center Modernization
Estimator last updated -.
Exchange rates last updated on -.
|
|
|
| Inputs | ||||||||||
|
Reset | |||||||||
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
|
||
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
| Software Configuration Wizard | ||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
| EXISTING | NEW | |
|
-
+
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Total Cost of Ownership
Total Savings:
|
Cumulative Cash Flow Break Even Period (Months):
|
|
Number of Servers
Server Reduction: Servers
|
Estimated Performance
Performance Gain
|
|
Gross Total Cost of Ownership
Total Savings:
|
|
Discounted Total Cost of Ownership
Total Savings:
|
|
Gross Cumulative Cash Flow
Break Even Period (Months):
|
|
Discounted Cumulative Cash Flow
Break Even Period (Months):
|
|
Number of Servers
Server Reduction: Servers
|
|
Estimated Performance
Performance Gain
|
|
Annual Power / Cooling Requirements
Total Power Savings: kWh
|
|
Networking Cost per GB
Savings per GB:
|
|
Total Networking Cost
Total Networking Savings:
|
|
Labor
Total Labor Savings:
|
|
Storage
Total Storage Savings:
|
|
Annual Environmental Impact
Total CO2 Savings: lbs
|
Financial Results (Gross)
| Initial Investment | |
| Net Benefits | |
| Return on Investment (ROI) | |
| Net Present Value (NPV) | |
| Internal Rate of Return (IRR) | |
| Payback Period (months) |
Infrastructure Summary
| EXISTING | NEW | % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Servers | |||
| Virtual Machine Count | |||
| Average Server Utilization | |||
| Utilized Performance | |||
| Annual Power/Coolilng (kWh) | |||
| Annual Environmental Impact (lbs CO2) |
Gross Total Cost of Ownership
| Category | EXISTING | NEW | Savings | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server Capital | ||||
| Annual Labor | ||||
| Network | ||||
| Storage | ||||
| Capitalized Software Costs | ||||
| Other Project Costs/Rebates | ||||
| Installation Costs | ||||
| DC Capacity Capital | ||||
| Network and Server Maintenance | ||||
| Utility Expenses | ||||
| Annual Software Expenses | ||||
| Tax Implications | ||||
| Total |
Discounted Total Cost of Ownership
| Category | EXISTING | NEW | Savings | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server Capital | ||||
| Annual Labor | ||||
| Network | ||||
| Storage | ||||
| Capitalized Software Costs | ||||
| Other Project Costs/Rebates | ||||
| Installation Costs | ||||
| DC Capacity Capital | ||||
| Network and Server Maintenance | ||||
| Utility Expenses | ||||
| Annual Software Expenses | ||||
| Tax Implications | ||||
| Total |
Gross Cumulative Cash Flow Summary
| Investment | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Year 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server Capital | |||||||
| Annual Labor | |||||||
| Network | |||||||
| Storage | |||||||
| Capitalized Software Costs | |||||||
| Acquisition Cost Avoidance | |||||||
| Installation Costs | |||||||
| Data Center Capacity Capital | |||||||
| Network and Server Maintenance | |||||||
| Utility Expenses | |||||||
| Annual Software Expenses | |||||||
| Tax Implications | |||||||
| Annual Cash Flow | |||||||
| Cumulative Savings |
Discounted Cumulative Cash Flow Summary
| Investment | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Year 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server Capital | |||||||
| Annual Labor | |||||||
| Network | |||||||
| Storage | |||||||
| Capitalized Software Costs | |||||||
| Acquisition Cost Avoidance | |||||||
| Installation Costs | |||||||
| Data Center Capacity Capital | |||||||
| Network and Server Maintenance | |||||||
| Utility Expenses | |||||||
| Annual Software Expenses | |||||||
| Tax Implications | |||||||
| Annual Cash Flow | |||||||
| Cumulative Savings |
Server and Virtual Machine (VM) Summary
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Assumptions | |||||
| Scenario | |||||
| Existing Server Environment | |||||
| Server Type | |||||
| Server Age | |||||
| # Existing | |||||
| # New Demand | |||||
| Total Servers | |||||
| VMs per Server | |||||
| Total VMs | |||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | |||||
| Server Type | |||||
| # Replacement | |||||
| # New Demand | |||||
| Total Servers | |||||
| VMs per Server | |||||
| Total VMs | |||||
Estimated Performance
| Profile | Existing Environment | New Environment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Installed Servers | Added for Demand | Installed Servers | Added For Demand | |
| A | ||||
| B | ||||
| C | ||||
| D | ||||
| E | ||||
| All Profiles | ||||
| Difference | ||||
| % Change | ||||
Networking
| Profile | Existing Environment | New Environment |
|---|---|---|
| A | ||
| B | ||
| C | ||
| D | ||
| E | ||
| All Profiles | ||
| Difference | ||
| % Change | ||
Storage
| Profile | Existing Environment | New Environment |
|---|---|---|
| A | ||
| B | ||
| C | ||
| D | ||
| E | ||
| All Profiles | ||
| Difference | ||
| % Change | ||
Labor
| Profile | Existing Environment | New Environment |
|---|---|---|
| A | ||
| B | ||
| C | ||
| D | ||
| E | ||
| All Profiles | ||
| Difference | ||
| % Change | ||
Annual Power / Cooling Requirements (kWh)
| Profile | Existing Environment | New Environment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Installed Servers | Added for Demand | Installed Servers | Added for Demand | |
| A | ||||
| B | ||||
| C | ||||
| D | ||||
| E | ||||
| All Profiles | ||||
| Difference | ||||
| % Change | ||||
Annual Environmental Impact (lbs CO2)
| Profile | Existing Environment | New Environment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Installed Servers | Added for Demand | Installed Servers | Added for Demand | |
| A | ||||
| B | ||||
| C | ||||
| D | ||||
| E | ||||
| All Profiles | ||||
| Difference | ||||
| % Change | ||||
| More on IT@Intel |
| Whitepaper |
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Servers Purchased for Replacement | ||||||
| Servers Purchased for Incremental Demand | ||||||
| Purchase Price Per Server | ||||||
| Software License Costs Per Server | ||||||
| Installation and Migration Costs Per Server | ||||||
| Software Validation Costs Per Server | ||||||
| Sub-Total: Server Investment Costs | ||||||
| Non-Server Hardware Costs | ||||||
| Other Implementation Costs | ||||||
| Other One Time Project Costs | ||||||
| Additional Cost Avoidance due to Refresh | ||||||
| Server Disposal Costs (old environment) | ||||||
| Sub-Total: Non Server Investment Costs | ||||||
| Total Initial Investment |
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| Number of Servers (beginning of year) | ||||||
| Servers Added for Incremental Demand | ||||||
| Average Purchase Price per Server | ||||||
| Total Server Hardware Purchases | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| Servers Purchased for Replacement | ||||||
| Servers Added for Incremental Demand | ||||||
| Average Purchase Price per Server | ||||||
| Total Server Hardware Purchases | ||||||
| Server Reduction | ||||||
| Cumulative Savings (Gross) | ||||||
| Cumulative Savings (Discounted) | ||||||
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| 10 GB Capital | ||||||
| 10 GB Expenses | ||||||
| Sub-Total: Networking Costs | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| 10 GB Capital | ||||||
| 10 GB Expenses | ||||||
| Sub-Total: Networking Costs | ||||||
| Total Network Savings (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Network Savings (Discounted) | ||||||
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| HDD/SSD Capital | ||||||
| HDD/SSD Expenses | ||||||
| Sub-Total: Storage Costs | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| HDD/SSD Capital | ||||||
| HDD/SSD Expenses | ||||||
| Sub-Total: Storage Costs | ||||||
| Total Storage Savings (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Storage Savings (Discounted) | ||||||
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| Gross Existing Labor Cost per Year | ||||||
| Gross New State Labor Cost per Year | ||||||
| Gross Annual Labor Savings | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| New Annual Labor Cost | ||||||
| New Annual Labor Savings | ||||||
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| Servers Added for Incremental Demand | ||||||
| Average Software License Cost per Server | ||||||
| Software License Costs | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| New Servers (Replacement & Incremental) | ||||||
| Average Software License Cost per Server | ||||||
| Software License Costs | ||||||
| Capitalized Software Costs (Gross) | ||||||
| Capitalized Software Costs (Discounted) | ||||||
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquisition Cost Avoidance | ||||||
| Total Energy Rebates | ||||||
| Total Other Costs (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Other Costs (Discounted) |
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| Servers Added for Incremental Demand | ||||||
| Average Installation Costs per Server | ||||||
| Sub-Total: New Server Installation Costs | ||||||
| Software Validation Costs per Server | ||||||
| Sub-Total: Software Validation Costs | ||||||
| Total Existing Server Installation Costs | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| Servers Purchased for Replacement | ||||||
| Servers Purchased for Incremental Demand | ||||||
| Average Installation Costs per Server | ||||||
| Sub-Total: New Server Installation Costs | ||||||
| Software Validation Costs per Server | ||||||
| Sub-Total: Software Validation Costs | ||||||
| Sub-Total: Other Hardware Capital Costs | ||||||
| Sub-Total: One Time Project Costs | ||||||
| Number of Servers Retired | ||||||
| Average Disposal Costs per Server | ||||||
| Sub-Total: Disposal Costs | ||||||
| Total New Server Installation Costs | ||||||
| Total Installation Costs (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Installation Costs (Discounted) | ||||||
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Servers Added for Incremental Demand | ||||||
| Power Requirements per Server (kW) | ||||||
| Total Power Requirements (kW) | ||||||
| Data Center Capacity Costs | ||||||
| Total DC Capacity Avoidance (Gross) | ||||||
| Total DC Capacity Avoidance (Discounted) |
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| Number of Servers | ||||||
| Average Annual Networking Costs per Server | ||||||
| Total Network Expense (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Network Expense (Discounted) | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| Number of Servers | ||||||
| Average Annual Networking Costs per Server | ||||||
| Total Network Expense (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Network Expense (Discounted) | ||||||
| Number of Servers | ||||||
| Cumulative Savings (Gross) | ||||||
| Cumulative Savings (Discounted) | ||||||
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| Number of Servers with Extended Maintenance | ||||||
| Average Maintenance Cost Per Server | ||||||
| Total Server Maintenance Costs (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Server Maintenance Costs (Discounted) | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| Number of Servers with Extended Maintenance | ||||||
| Average Maintenance Cost Per Server | ||||||
| Total Server Maintenance Costs (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Server Maintenance Costs (Discounted) | ||||||
| Number of Servers | ||||||
| Cumulative Savings (Gross) | ||||||
| Cumulative Savings (Discounted) | ||||||
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Server Maintenance Costs (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Server Maintenance Costs (Discounted) |
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| Number of Existing Servers | ||||||
| New Servers (Incremental Demand) | ||||||
| Hours of Operation | ||||||
| Utility Rate (per Kilowatt-Hour) | ||||||
| Utility Growth Rate (per Year) | ||||||
| PUE | ||||||
| Total Utility Expenses (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Utility Expenses (Discounted) | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| New Servers (Replacement) | ||||||
| New Servers (Incremental Demand) | ||||||
| Hours of Operation | ||||||
| Utility Rate (per Kilowatt-Hour) | ||||||
| Utility Growth Rate (per Year) | ||||||
| PUE | ||||||
| Total Utility Expenses (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Utility Expenses (Discounted) | ||||||
| Total Utility Expense Savings (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Utility Expense Savings (Discounted) | ||||||
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| Number of Servers | ||||||
| Annual Software Maintenance Fees per Server | ||||||
| Annual Software Maintenance Fees (Gross) | ||||||
| Annual Software Maintenance Fees (Discounted) | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| Number of Servers | ||||||
| Annual Software Maintenance Fees per Server | ||||||
| Annual Software Maintenance Fees (Gross) | ||||||
| Annual Software Maintenance Fees (Discounted) | ||||||
| Server Reduction | ||||||
| Cumulative Savings (Gross) | ||||||
| Cumulative Savings (Discounted) | ||||||
| Profile A | Profile B | Profile C | Profile D | Profile E | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | ||||||
| Total Operating Costs | ||||||
| Marginal Tax Rate | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Tax Implications (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Tax Implications (Discounted) | ||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | ||||||
| Total Operating Costs | ||||||
| Marginal Tax Rate | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Tax Implications (Gross) | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Tax Implications (Discounted) | ||||||
| Cumulative Savings (Gross) | ||||||
| Cumulative Savings (Discounted) | ||||||
| Investment | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Year 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Server Environment | |||||||
| Existing Server Depreciation | |||||||
| Number of Existing Servers | |||||||
| Annual Depreciation per Server | |||||||
| Total Depreciation Expense for Existing Servers | |||||||
| Annual Depreciation for New Servers and Software Purchased for Incremental Demand | |||||||
| Server Capital Costs | |||||||
| Software Capital Costs | |||||||
| Network - 10 GB Capital | |||||||
| HDD/SSD - Capital | |||||||
| Annual Depreciation Expense | |||||||
| Annual Depreciation for Data Center Expansion | |||||||
| Data Center Capital Costs | |||||||
| Annual Depreciation Expense | |||||||
| Total Annual Depreciation Expense | |||||||
| New Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Environment | |||||||
| Existing Server Write Offs | |||||||
| Number of Existing Servers | |||||||
| Remaining Book Value per Server | |||||||
| Total Depreciation Expense for Existing Servers | |||||||
| Annual Depreciation for new Intel-Based Servers and Software | |||||||
| Server Capital Costs | |||||||
| Software Capital Costs | |||||||
| Network - 10 GB Capital | |||||||
| HDD/SSD - Capital | |||||||
| Total Annual Depreciation Expense | |||||||
| Total Annual Depreciation Expense | |||||||
| Annual Savings | |||||||
| Cumulative Savings | |||||||
| Servers | Sockets | Cores | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing Servers: | ||||
| Inc Demand Servers: | ||||
| New Servers: |
| Software Environment |
Software Profile | Licenses Needed |
| Operating System | ||
| Database | ||
| Application Server | ||
| Systems Management | ||
| Virtualization Software | ||
| Other Software | ||
| Annual Price per License | Annual Support Fee | |
| Operating System | ||
| Database | ||
| Application Server | ||
| Systems Management | ||
| Virtualization Software | ||
| Other Software | ||
| Total Annual Software Cost per Server |
| Software Environment |
Software Profile | Transfer License? |
Licenses Needed |
| Operating System | |||
| Database | |||
| Application Server | |||
| Systems Management | |||
| Virtualization Software | |||
| Other Software | |||
| Annual Price per License | Annual Support Fee | ||
| Operating System | |||
| Database | |||
| Application Server | |||
| Systems Management | |||
| Virtualization Software | |||
| Other Software | |||
| Total Annual Software Cost per Server |
|||
| What industry do you work in? | |
| What is your job role? | |
| What is your company's size? | |
| Did this tool help you make a decision on your server refresh? | |
| Submit | |
After downloading you can modify the document / powerpoint format and template.
The Intel IT team found that proactive communication across our IT organization and internal business stakeholders was critical to gaining support for our internal virtualization and refresh efforts. The attached reports replicate the key messages that were beneficial in justifying and prioritizing these investments.
| Create | Microsoft PowerPoint* 2007 or higher |
| Create | Adobe* PDF |
Use of the Tool shall be construed to be User's agreement to these terms.
YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE READ THIS AGREEMENT AND UNDERSTAND IT AND THAT BY DOWNLOADING, INSTALLING OR USING THE INTEL® XEON® PROCESSOR-BASED SERVER REFRESH SAVINGS ESTIMATOR ACCOMPANYING THIS AGREEMENT ("TOOL"), YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS. IF YOU ARE ACCESSING THE TOOL ELECTRONICALLY, INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THESE TERMS BY SELECTING THE "ACCEPT" BUTTON BELOW. IF YOU DO NOT ACCEPT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, SELECT THE "DECLINE" BUTTON BELOW. IF YOU RECEIVED THE TOOL ON A PHYSICAL MEDIA AND DO NOT ACCEPT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, YOU MAY RETURN THE PHYSICAL MEDIA UNOPENED AND GET A REFUND. INTEL IS UNWILLING TO LICENSE THE TOOL TO YOU IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT. AS USED HEREIN, "YOU" MEANS THE INDIVIDUAL DOWNLOADING THE TOOL AND HIS/HER EMPLOYER AND "INTEL" MEANS INTEL CORPORATION. CERTAIN TERMS USED HEREIN ARE DEFINED ABOVE AND BELOW
Intel does not warrant that this Tool will be error-free, or free of viruses, defects or other harmful components. You agree that your use of the Tool is at your sole risk. This applies regardless of whether the Tool is used alone or with other software.
The results generated or scenarios described in the Tool are estimates and should only be used as a guide to evaluate the cost/benefit or feasibility of a future purchase of systems with Intel Xeon Processors. The actual economic results realized as a result of a purchase of systems with Intel Xeon Processors will vary and there is no guarantee that you will actually realize the economic results forecast by the Tool. There may be additional unaccounted for costs related to the use and deployment of servers that are not or can not be accounted for on this Tool. Any estimate generated by the Tool is not and should not be interpreted as either a promise of or contract for a given level of IT support cost and savings. Prior to purchasing any systems with Intel Xeon Processors you should consult with qualified IT professionals to ensure that any such purchases fit your particular circumstances. Intel does not and cannot guarantee the accuracy or reliability of the results generated by the Tool or that you will actually realize any cost savings as forecast by the Tool.
General Disclaimer: The Tool is an interactive tool that uses the information that you supply to provide an estimate of your possible IT costs and savings when replacing existing installed servers and replacing them with Intel® Xeon® Processor technology. The Tool is intended to enable you to get a better understanding of how the purchase of systems with Intel Xeon Processor technology, combined with a number of situation-specific variables (e.g., the number of platforms in your enterprise, the rate at which you upgrade or replace the platforms in your enterprise, the additional cost of Servers with Intel Xeon Processors charged by your OEM, the incremental per system configuration cost, additional ISV software license cost, additional ISV software installation cost, the number of employees that require training on Intel Xeon® Processor technology, or training each trainee will receive) might affect your future IT support cost and savings. The general accuracy of the estimate generated by the Tool will depend on how closely the variables chosen by you match your actual circumstances.
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. THE TOOL IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. INTEL DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, NONINFRINGEMENT, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. INTEL ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSEQUENCES RESULTING FROM THE USE OF OR RELIANCE ON ANY ESTIMATES GENERATED BY THE TOOL OR THE SCENARIOS DESCRIBED IN THIS TOOL. INTEL IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY FOR, DAMAGES OF ANY KIND ARISING OUT OF THE USE, REFERENCE TO, RELIANCE ON OR PERFORMANCE OF SUCH INFORMATION. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE USE, OUTPUT, ANALYSIS, RESULTS, QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE TOOL IS ASSUMED BY YOU. IF YOU RECEIVE ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING THE TOOL, THOSE WARRANTIES DO NOT ORIGINATE FROM, AND ARE NOT BINDING ON INTEL. INTEL DOES NOT WARRANT OR ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY INFORMATION, TEXT, GRAPHICS, LINKS OR OTHER ITEMS CONTAINED WITHIN THE TOOL.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. IN NO EVENT SHALL INTEL OR ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, DIRECTORS, SUBSIDIARIES, REPRESENTATIVES, AFFILIATES AND AGENTS HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO YOU OR ANY OTHER THIRD PARTY, FOR ANY LOST PROFITS, LOST DATA, LOSS OF USE OR COSTS OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES, OR FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT, UNDER ANY CAUSE OF ACTION OR THEORY OF LIABILITY, AND IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER INTEL OR ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, DIRECTORS, SUBSIDIARIES, REPRESENTATIVES, AFFILIATES AND AGENTS HAVE ADVANCE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. THESE LIMITATIONS SHALL APPLY NOTWITHSTANDING THE FAILURE OF THE ESSENTIAL PURPOSE OF ANY LIMITED REMEDY. IN ANY CASE, INTEL'S AND ITS OFFICERS', EMPLOYEES', DIRECTORS', SUBSIDIARIES', REPRESENTATIVES', AFFILIATES' AND AGENTS' ENTIRE LIABILITY UNDER ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNTS OF THE FEES THAT YOU PAID FOR THE TOOL (IF ANY).
Intel, Intel Xeon, Intel Core microarchitecture, and the Intel logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.
Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details.
Results have been estimated based on Intel internal analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance
SPEC, SPECint_rate_base2000 and SPECint_rate_base2006 are trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. See http://www.spec.org for more information.
Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmark data or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmark data are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmark data are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase.
Intel's compilers may or may not optimize to the same degree for non-Intel microprocessors for optimizations that are not unique to Intel microprocessors. These optimizations include SSE2, SSE3, and SSE3 instruction sets and other optimizations. Intel does not guarantee the availability, functionality, or effectiveness of any optimization on microprocessors not manufactured by Intel. Microprocessor-dependent optimizations in this product are intended for use with Intel microprocessors. Certain optimizations not specific to Intel microarchitecture are reserved for Intel microprocessors. Please refer to the applicable product User and Reference Guides for more information regarding the specific instruction sets covered by this notice. Notice revision #20110804
Copyright © 2017, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
*Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
System pricing is based on list price of equivalently configured servers, when available, from leading OEMs.
1S Server Pricing:
2S Server Pricing:
4S Server Pricing:
Performance:
Server performance based on best publically available SPECint_rate_base2006* results from www.spec.org as of June 27, 2017. For any processor not listed, SPECint_rate_base2006* performance results are based on Intel estimates.
Server power consumption is based on Intel measurements and estimates from Feb 2008 through June 2017 and other public sources as listed below.
1 Socket Server Power:
2 Socket Server Power:
4 Socket Server Power:
The Intel® Data Center Modernization Estimator is being configured. Please wait a few seconds.
You can either create a new profile with default values, or you can create a new profile by copying from an existing profile. How do you want to create your new profile?
Thank you!
Resetting the data will cause your current inputs across all profiles to be lost. Are you sure you want to reset?
Changing the baseline will reset all reference server configuration values including initial average utilization. Do you want to continue?
The server refresh scenario is used to determine the proposed method of consolidation. If your current environment is virtualized, select Virtual to Virtual scenario. If your current environment is not virtualized today, but you intend to deploy virtualization on your new servers, select Physical to Virtual scenario. If your current environment is not virtualized today and you plan to remain not virtualized, select the Physical to Physical scenario.
Review and edit information about the existing servers you desire to replace and the new ones you'd like to deploy.
Enter the type of server you would like to refresh with.
Server price, performance per server, power (busy and idle) and software defaults costs will update automatically based on the server type changes as long as you have not overridden those fields. If you have changed one of these listed fields manually, the automatic update feature will no longer work.
To restore the automatic update feature, you must reset all affected fields to the default calculated value by clicking on the "lock" button provided in that field.
Source: Intel® Corporation for Intel-based systems and Alinean, INC for all others.
Review/modify the type of existing servers. Change the model type to evaluate different server refresh situations. Server price, performance per server, power (busy and idle) and software defaults costs will update automatically based on the server type changes as long as you have not overridden those fields. If you have changed one of these above fields manually, the automatic update feature will no longer work.
For the automatic update feature to work, you must reset affected fields to the default calculated value by clicking on the "calculator" button provided in that field.
Estimate the age of your existing servers. The age of the existing servers is used to estimate the total performance of your existing installed base, which is then used to calculate the number of new servers you need to match that estimated performance. The age of your servers is also used in computing depreciation and possible write-off costs.
Server performance based on best published SPECint_rate_base2006 performance and/or Intel estimates as of December 10, 2014.
If you wish to use a different benchmark or your own real world application test, adjust the performance results of both the existing and new servers.
Review and edit the server related information for this Profile.
Review/modify the number of existing installed servers and the number of replacement servers needed to support that current environment.
Specify the number of additional servers that are needed at this time to support incremental (new) processing demand.
Any incremental servers are assumed to be of the same server type as the proposed new Intel servers selected above.
Default calculations for the new incremental server demand is calculated below:
Physical to Physical: The new incremental server demand will be assumed to be the same as existing. It is assumed you would add current technology for any incremental computing needs regardless of whether you refresh or not.
Physical to Virtual: The new incremental server demand is reduced by the projected VM loading of the new servers. Example: if new VM loading is 10VM/server, and user adds 50 existing incremental demand, then new incremental demand will be 5 servers.
Virtual to Virtual: The new incremental server demand will be assumed to be the same as existing. It is assumed you would add current technology for any incremental computing and projected VM loading for the new environments.
Adds the number of servers from original servers for replacement and servers added for incremental demand.
Review and edit the amount of average virtualization per server desired for the servers in this Profile.
Review/modify the number of VM/s per server for your existing and new environment. If you desire to update this field but are unable to, ensure that you update your Refresh Scenario to be either Physical to Virtual or Virtual to Virtual. Restore default calculations with the lock buttons
The new VM/server default calculation is calculated as follows.
User may change these values to model their desired virtualization loading per server in the new or old environment.
Virtualization loading will affect the % server utilization calculations below.
Total VMs calculates the number of virtual machines based on the number of servers and VM/server data you have entered.
Review and Compare your modeled total utilized performance before/after refresh.
Utilized Performance is calculated based on the amount of total performance available reduced by the average anticipated utilization of those servers.
Percentage of time server is busy running jobs. Review and compare your modeled total utilized performance before/after refresh. Utilized Performance is calculated based on the amount of total performance available reduced by the average anticipated utilization of those servers.
Default Estimated Existing Server Utilization is assumed to be 10% per Virtual Machine, up to a maximum of 100%.
Default Estimated New Server Utilization Calculation is based on many factors:
The default formula used to calculate the Physical to Virtual and Virtual to Virtual utilization for new servers reads as such:
Replacement Utilization = {(Existing Server Utilization/Existing VM loading per server)*1.15*Replacement VM loading per server}*{Existing Performance per Server/Replacement Performance per Server}
Estimated utilized performance is calculated by taking number of servers times the performance per server (SPECint_rate_base2006 benchmark is default) times the percent utilization for the servers.
This section allows you to edit the software costs for this profile.
Software Licensing Costs represent the cost per server to purchase new licenses for your new environment or any incremental demand for existing environment. For proper costing, ensure this field is cost per server.
Use the Software Wizard for aid in modeling your software costs.
Software maintenance fees represent the cost per server to maintain existing and new licenses per year for your existing and new environments, including any incremental demand for existing environment. For proper costing, ensure this field is cost per server per year.
Use the Software Wizard for aid in modeling your software costs.
The cost per server for validating software configurations on newly installed servers (applies for the new server environment plus incremental demand, if any).
This section allows you to include or exclude a variety of common financial variables in your estimates of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and Return on Investment (ROI).
In consolidation or constrained infrastructure scenarios, refresh allows increased compute output (performance, hosts, etc.) with less physical resources. In these cases, the cost of avoiding incremental data center capacity should be when evaluating the benefits of server refresh.
If existing servers are replaced before they are fully depreciated, then this field will allow you write off that residual value as a savings.
Often server refresh enables a smaller physical server environment by running fewer, higher-performance, more energy-efficient servers. This field enables you to include the benefits from reduced power / cooling costs.
Annual software licensing or maintenance fees based on the number of servers, cores, processors that are directly related to the number of servers operated on an annualized basis. Operating a smaller fleet of servers may provide a financial benefit for software fees.
Maintaining aging servers can have costs in extended warranties resulting in higher per server maintenance costs.
Network costs are often related to the number of servers in your environment. Refresh may affect the size of the server fleet resulting in a cost reduction.
For Profit businesses often can write off a portion of their operating costs as a tax benefit reducing total costs.
If you are a NON PROFIT Business, do NOT pay taxes, or your corporate protocols do not include tax implications, we recommend you exclude this variable.
This will add any costs associated with installing new equipment for servers identified for both replacement or incremental compute demand.
This will add any costs associated with validating a new software environment on any new servers you are deploying (either replacement or incremental compute demand).
This will add any costs with removing targeted end-of-life servers in the specified refresh scenario.
This section allows you to specify various initial costs.
System pricing is based on list price for equivalently configured servers from Dell, HP, IBM, and Sun. For current generation Intel-based 1S servers, pricing is based on average price of Dell* PE840, HP* ML110 G5, IBM* x3200 M2 as of March 4, 2009. All systems configured with 1 Intel® Xeon® X3360 or higher processor, 4x2GB memory, 1x160GB SATA drive, 1 PSU. For current generation AMD-based 1S servers, pricing is based on HP* ML115 as of March 13, 2009. For current generation Intel-based 2S servers, pricing is based on average price of Dell 2950 IIII, HP DL380 G5, IBM X3650, and Sun X4150 as of March 4, 2009. All systems configured with 2 Intel® Xeon® X5460 processors or higher, 8x2GB memory, 1x72GB SAS drive, 1 PSU. For current generation AMD-based 2S servers, pricing is based on HP DL385 G5p as of March 13, 2009. For current generation Intel-based 4S servers, pricing is based on average price of Dell R900, HP DL580, IBM X3850, and Sun X4450 as of March 4, 2009. All systems configured with 4 Intel® Xeon® X7350 processors or higher, 16x2GB memory, 1x72GB SAS drive, non-redundant power supply. For current generation AMD-based 4S servers, pricing is based on HP DL585 G5 as of March 13, 2009.
Source: Intel® Corporation for Intel-based systems and Alinean, INC for all others.
The costs to install a new server (cost per server).
The costs to dispose of existing servers (cost per server).
The cost to upgrade network infrastructure as part of the profile. Example: LAN optimization or refresh (chassis/cable, etc) as part of refresh.
The cost to upgrade storage infrastructure as part of the profile. Example: Include additional SAN or upgrade to SAN to complement virtualization and/or refresh.
The cost to upgrade rack infrastructure as part of the profile. Example: upgrading from 1u rack to a blade environment.
Placeholder for any additional costs for the profile evaluation. Example: consulting fees etc.
This section allows you to modify various maintenance costs and warranty information.
Enter the number of years for your server warranty.
Cost per server per year for hardware maintenance/support of any "out-of-warranty" maintenance.
Cost per server per year for network maintenance expense. Since the number of network ports changes with the number of servers, this variable cost is captured as a savings when moving from existing to new server environment.
This section allows you to modify various costs associated with powering and cooling your servers.
Server power consumption is based on internal measurements or estimates from Feb 2008 through March 2009. For current generation Intel-based 2S servers, idle and peak power consumption is based on the average power consumption of Dell* PE2950 III and HP* DL380 G5 configured with 2 Intel® Xeon® X5460 processors or higher, 8x2GB memory, 1x72GB SAS drive, 1 PSU. For current generation AMD-based 2S servers, idle and peak power consumption is based on HP* DL385 G5 and DL385 G5p configured with 2 Opteron* 2352 processors or 2 Opteron* 2384 processors, 8x2GB memory, 1x72GB SAS drive, 1 PSU. For current generation Intel-based 4S servers, idle and peak power consumption is based on the average power consumption of Dell* R900, HP* DL580, IBM* X3850, and Sun* X4450 configured with 4 Intel® Xeon® X7350 processors or higher, 16x2GB memory, 1x72GB SAS drive, non-redundant power supply. For current generation AMD-based 2S servers, idle and peak power consumption is based on HP* DL585 configured with 4 Opteron* 8352 processors or higher, 16x2GB memory, 1x72GB SAS drive, non-redundant power supply configuration.
Server power consumption is based on internal measurements or estimates from Feb 2008 through March 2009. For current generation Intel-based 2S servers, idle and peak power consumption is based on the average power consumption of Dell* PE2950 III and HP* DL380 G5 configured with 2 Intel® Xeon® X5460 processors or higher, 8x2GB memory, 1x72GB SAS drive, 1 PSU. For current generation AMD-based 2S servers, idle and peak power consumption is based on HP* DL385 G5 and DL385 G5p configured with 2 Opteron* 2352 processors or 2 Opteron* 2384 processors, 8x2GB memory, 1x72GB SAS drive, 1 PSU. For current generation Intel-based 4S servers, idle and peak power consumption is based on the average power consumption of Dell* R900, HP* DL580, IBM* X3850, and Sun* X4450 configured with 4 Intel® Xeon® X7350 processors or higher, 16x2GB memory, 1x72GB SAS drive, non-redundant power supply. For current generation AMD-based 2S servers, idle and peak power consumption is based on HP* DL585 configured with 4 Opteron* 8352 processors or higher, 16x2GB memory, 1x72GB SAS drive, non-redundant power supply configuration.
Cost per kilowatt hour for utility power.
Factor to estimate future utility rate increases year over year ($/kWh).
Estimate the approximate average hours of server operation for this profile.
Power Use Effectiveness (PUE) is a factor to estimate infrastructure cooling efficiency and cost requirements. The default value is set at 2.0. A PUE of 2.0 means that your non-IT power (e.g. cooling, HVAC, lighting, etc.) is equal to your IT power (e.g. server, storage, networking). Therefore total power consumption is estimated 2 times the IT power consumption.
Estimated Cost (in $ per KW) for Data Center infrastructure capacity additions. This field is used to calculate the cost avoidance savings of not having to build new server infrastructure to accommodate incremental growth if you did not refresh your old servers.
This section allows you to modify various financial parameters.
Weighted Average Cost of Capital or Hurdle Rate for Organization.
Organization's marginal tax rate.
This section allows you to address the cost of depreciating hardware.
This field allows you to adjust the use life for straight line financial depreciation for any new servers purchased in this profile.
This field allows you to adjust the use life for straight line financial depreciation for any network implementation costs identified in this profile.
This field allows you to adjust the use life for straight line financial depreciation for any storage implementation costs identified in this profile.
This field allows you to adjust the use life for straight line financial depreciation for any rack implementation costs identified in this profile.
This section allows you to capture other costs in addition to what have entered already that apply to your profile.
Enter any costs taken today to offset costs in the future, such as replacing parts before they fail, etc.
Enter any other costs you may have not yet entered.
If applicable to your environment.
This section allows you to specify migration details from HDD to SSD.
Form factor is the size of the HDD in your environment.
Storage interface is how the HDD communicates with the host system. It impacts price of the solution.
RPM impacts performance, power consumed, and price of the storage solution.
Total capacity impacts price of the storage solution.
The number of installed HDDs impacts performance, power consumed, and price of the storage solution as well as replacement and maintenance costs.
Enter a percentage that represents the amount of capacity actually used in each HDD in your environment. (To obtain better performance, some systems reserve free space on each HDD. For example, a system requiring 1 TB of storage may deploy 10 TB of HDDs, using only 10% capacity on each HDD.) This option is only required on systems with “No RAID” configuration.
The type of RAID configuration used impacts HDD performance and the actual capacity required for the storage environment.
Choose the type and density of the Intel SSDs. Over-provisioning refers to allocating free area in the SSD to increase random mixed workload performance. It is recommended to start with a non-over-provisioned configuration.
The desired RAID configuration of the target systems.
This section allows you to specify existing labor details to understand potential labor savings.
Number of engineering employees in current environment.
Average salary of engineering employees.
Number of operations employees in current environment.
Average salary of operations employees.
Number of administration employee’s in current environment.
Average salary of administration employees.
Number of other employees (not fitting into the above categories) in current environment.
Average salary of other employees.
The savings per dollar believed possible based on existing environment. Ex: 100% savings factor would mean you would save one dollar for every dollar of possible savings while a 50% savings factor would mean $0.50 savings realized on every $1.00 of possible savings. This number is based on the efficiency and automation that exists in the current environment. A less automated business would realize a higher savings factor than a more lean/efficient business.
This section will assist you in assessing the benefits of moving from 1 Gb adapters to 10 Gb adapters for the servers in your data center.
Number of Ethernet ports (adapters) per server in the existing state.
Number of Ethernet ports — 10 Gb or 1 Gb — (adapters) in the new state.
Chose the desired adapter type.
Do you want to connect to the SAN via iSCSI, FCoE, or Fibre Channel port or not.
Enter the number of Fibre Channels.
Select the speed of your Fibre Channels.
Enter the number of Ethernet ports.
Select the type of adapter card.
